*10 Recall that an issue in education is BREADTH vs DEPTH
For example when studying Talmud is it preferable to
- list many approaches to an issue (BREADTH)
- go into the pros-cons on one approach (DEPTH)

Similarly when analyzing a chess position
- Do you FIRST study all possible responses
- Or Do you FIRST study in depth one response

The Bible in Ex06-16:25 had a similar problem
- Do you FIRST list all children; 2nd all
GRANDCHILDREN; 3rd all GREAT GRANDCHILDREN
- Or do you FIRST list a whole genealogy
down to the 5th generation followed by
a whole a genealogy to another 4th-5th
generations.

These are all BREADTH vs DEPTH problems (Similar
problems come up in computer science). The
Bible in Ex06-16:25 used the BREADTH approach

First all chilren are listed. Then each set
of grandchildren etc. This list which the
reader should check supports this.
------------------------------------
Verse   Level of genealogy mentioned
------- ----------------------------
16      1
17      2
18      2
19      2
20      3
21      3
22      3
23      4
24      4
25      5
-------------------------------------
The list has implications for teaching, playing
chess, writing programs and learning Talmud

In passing public comments were made when
Kasporov beat the computer--
------------------------------------------
the computer is good at depth analysis
at seeing many 100,000s of moves father

By contrast I used intuition (overview
of possible responses). (This is the
breadth approach).

The use of intuition vs analysis (breadth
vs depth) enabled me to beat the computer
-----------------------------------------

And now you know...all this comes explicitly
from the holy Torah.

- Praise be Him who chose them and their learning -