#######################################################
#       12 YEAR Ayelet DAILY-RASHI-YOMI CYCLE         #
#                 February 2nd,  2003                 #
#          Rashis 1863-1865 Of 7800 (23.9%)           #
#                                                     #
#           VISIT THE RASHI YOMI ARCHIVES             #
#           -----------------------------             #
#       http://www.RashiYomi.Com/calendar.htm         #
#                                                     #
#    Reprinted with permission from Rashi-is-Simple,  #
#  (c) 1999-2002, RashiYomi Inc., Dr Hendel President #
#   Permission to reprint with this header PROVIDED   #
#          it is not printed for profit               #
#                                                     #
#    WARNING: READ with COURIER 10 (Fixed width) FONTS#
#                                                     #
#######################################################

#*#*#*# (C) RashiYomi Inc., 2003, Dr. Hendel, President #*#*#*#*#
VERSE: Ex21-02a
RASHIS COVERED: Ex21-02a Ex21-13c Ex21-18a
Ex21-02a
(C) Dr Hendel, Jan-03


VERY BRIEF SUMMARY
------------------
One of Rashis 6 main methods is the
powerful ALIGNMENT method in which similar phrases,
verses, or chapters are aligned. The resulting minor
differences imply nuances, inuendoes and cases.

The Parshah of Mishpatim is particularly rich in
CHAPTER ALIGNMENTS--it is these comparisons of
whole chapters (vs internal analysis of phrases)
that gives MISHPATIM its charateristics Talmudic
flavor

EXAMPLE 1-Ex21-18a
------------------
There are 4 Biblical chapters on TORTS. This
gives rise to 5 types of tort damages
1) PERMANANT ORGAN DAMAGE
2) DISABILITY
3) MEDICAL
4) PAIN
5) EMBARASSMENT

EXAMPLE 2-Ex21-02a
------------------
There are 3-5 Biblical chapters on Slaves.
We see emerge 3 types of slaves
1) Non Jewish
2) Jewish-Voluntarily sold (Because of poverty)
3) Jewish-Sold by court because of debt

EXAMPLE 3-Ex21-13c
------------------
Several contrasting verses exist on Gods providence
1) God is seen as WANTING REPENTANCE
2) God is seen as WANTING VENGENANCE
The resolution of these 2 contradictory statements
leads to further insights on Gods providence
ITEM DETAIL
RASHI RULE CLASS: ALIGNMENT
RASHI SUBRULE CLASS: TWO CASES
RASHI WORKBOOK PRINCIPLE #10
SEE BELOW LIST310a
A list of verses dealing with torts
------------------------ ------------------------
SEE BELOW LIST310a
A list of verses dealing with torts
------------------------ ------------------------
SEE BELOW LIST311a
A list of verses dealing with slaves
------------------------ ------------------------
SEE BELOW LIST312a
A list of verses about Gods justice
LIST310a
(C) Dr Hendel, Jan-03


The Torah mentions torts in 4 contexts.
This gives rise to the 5 tort categories
- PERMANANT ORGAN DAMAGES
- PAIN etc.
Note how each context defines an obvious class
For example making someone bedridden typically involves
disability and medical.
VERSE TORT PERMANANT DISABILITY MEDICAL PAIN EMBARASS
Ex21-18a Bedridden X X
Ex21-24 Eye,Tooth X
Dt25-12 Testicles X
Dt23-29 Rape X
LIST311a
(C) Dr Hendel, Jan-03


The Torah mentions torts in 4 contexts.
This gives rise to the 5 tort categories
- PERMANANT ORGAN DAMAGES
- PAIN etc.
Note how each context defines an obvious class
For example making someone bedridden typically involves
disability and medical.
VERSE PHRASE1 PHRASE2 PHRASE3
Ex21-02a Sold Hebrew slave work 6 years and free on 7th
Dt15-12 Sold Hebrew brothers work 6 years and free on 7th
Differs *1 *2 *3
COMMENTS
*1 Since the tails of the verses are the same we infer
that both verses deal with the same case--that is
we infer that HEBREW SLAVE means a JEW (HEBREW) sold
as a slave*10

*2 These phrases are the same

LONGER FOOTNOTES

*10 Rashi points out that the Hebrew construction is
--- HEBREW SLAVE ---
ambiguous and can equally mean
- (ADJECTIVE) A SLAVE that is a JEW (HEbrew)
- (POSSESSIVE) A SLAVE owned by a Hebrew

Hence this alignment decides which of these
competing grammatical usages apply.

Rashi presents some additional Talmudic logic on
what I would have thought without this verse.
Such explorations are useful but must be
preceded by an understanding of what the verse
teaches.

Similar grammatical ambiguities exist elsewhere in
Tnach (eg does Ex20-02 refer to gODS of OTHER PEOPLE
(POSSESSIVE) or OTHER GODS (ADJECTIVE)

Our goal in this email list is to present Rashis
main point. Rashis main point in this posting is
the alignment which illumines the ambiguous
grammatical phrase HEBREW SLAVE
LIST312a
(C) Dr Hendel, Jan-03


The Torah in various places speaks about Gods justice

The Torah frequently presents God as merciful

But sometimes the Torah presents God as seeking vengenance!
This typically occurs by irreversible and reprehensible
crimes.*10 *11
VERSE TEXT OF VERSE
Ex21-13c God PLOTTED that he should kill*1
1S24-13 Evil only happens to the wicked
Lv20-05 I will place My face against him*1
-------- ----------------------------------------------
Ez18-32 I dont want the death of the wicked;but repent
COMMENTS
*1 Rashi gives the example of person A who
intentionally killed A' while person B accidentally
killed B'. These crimes are irreversible. Hence
if B and A meet, B may accidentally kill A since
- A deserves to die for his intentional killing
- B deserves to go into exile for his accident
killing.

Similarly the Child-offerer (Lv20-05) causes the
child irreversible damage and therefore God
places his face against him.

However ordinary sinners are encouraged to repent

LONGER FOOTNOTES

*10 We can also approach these Rashis using the famous
Rabbi Ishmael method of contradictory verses. In
fact the method of contradictory verses can be
approached in 3 ways
- thru contradiction
- thru the method of OTHER VERSES
- thru the method of ALIGNMENT

*11 Rashi only brings one of the verses in this list
However as is our usual custom I bring in other
similar verses
#*#*#*# (C) RashiYomi Inc., 2003, Dr. Hendel, President #*#*#*#*#